Skip to main content

Posts

AI Model Updates: A Regression Checklist for Small Teams

Practical guide | October 25, 2026 A new model can improve one task while changing the behavior your workflow depends on. Before switching an existing automation, test the whole job rather than relying on a benchmark headline. Save the current baseline Record the model configuration, prompt, tool permissions and representative outputs. Keep examples of past failures as well as ordinary tasks. Without a baseline, it is difficult to tell whether a new problem came from the model or another part of the workflow. Check the boundaries Test ambiguous instructions, unavailable sources and requests outside the intended scope. Verify that the system preserves uncertainty and stops for required approvals. If the agent can publish or send messages, use a test destination with harmless content during evaluation. Validate integrations Inspect structured fields, tool arguments and error handling. Check whether long inputs are truncated, whether citations support the text, and whether retries create ...
Recent posts

AI Agent Audit Logs: Record Actions Without Creating Another Data Leak

Practical guide | October 25, 2026 If an AI agent changes a document or sends information to another service, an incident reviewer needs to reconstruct the action. Logging everything indiscriminately can create a second problem: a new store of private content and credentials. Record the decision boundary Useful fields include the task identifier, acting identity, tool name, destination, time, permission decision and execution outcome. Where human approval is required, link the action to the approved version. Separate a proposed action from a completed one. Keep secrets out Redact authorization headers, tokens and unnecessary personal details. Review nested tool parameters and error messages, which may contain sensitive values even when the main prompt does not. Apply redaction before records reach shared dashboards or third-party monitoring services. Restrict the log itself Give reviewers access according to their responsibilities. Decide how long each class of record is needed, how it...

AI Retrieval Permissions: Why Search Results Must Respect Document Access

Enterprise explainer | October 25, 2026 An internal AI search tool may produce an answer from several documents. That convenience creates a basic access-control question: is the person asking allowed to read every document used in the answer? Check access before retrieval A search index may contain material from departments with different permissions. Filtering only the final answer is a fragile place to enforce access. Retrieval and execution components should apply the user's authorization before restricted content reaches the response workflow. Include indirect disclosures A leak does not require a full document download. An answer might reveal a confidential project name, a sentence from an HR file or a citation title. Test snippets, previews and generated summaries as well as the source viewer. Test permission changes Create test documents with harmless distinctive phrases. Give two test users different access, then compare results. Remove a user's access and repeat after ...

How to Compare AI Tools Using Your Real Workflow

Buyer workflow | October 25, 2026 A product demonstration is designed to show a tool at its best. Your own recurring task is a more useful purchasing test. Choose one job you understand well enough to evaluate without relying on the tool's explanation of its own performance. Define a finished result For a weekly report, list the required facts, format and audience. Decide which mistakes are unacceptable. A beautiful report with an invented number should fail even if it saves drafting time. Use the same inputs Prepare public or sanitized examples and give each tool the same brief. Record any extra instructions or manual steps. If one product receives much more help, the comparison measures your prompting effort as well as the product. Measure the whole job Track setup, generation, fact checking, revision and export. Note whether you can edit the result in your normal software. A fast response may not save time if formatting and corrections consume the rest of the afternoon. Check pr...

AI Agent Memory Security: What to Save, Review and Remove

Practical guide | October 25, 2026 Persistent memory can save an AI assistant from repeatedly asking the same question. It can also preserve a mistake or malicious instruction long after the original document is forgotten. Classify what is being stored Separate stable preferences, temporary task state and externally retrieved facts. A preferred writing style may remain useful for months. A product's price or availability needs a source and a review date. Instructions copied from a web page should not silently become permanent operating rules. Keep provenance Record where a memory came from and who approved it when approval is relevant. If an agent remembers that an article was published, store the verified URL rather than a vague completion claim. Provenance makes correction possible when an earlier conclusion turns out to be wrong. Minimize sensitive material Do not use general agent memory as a password vault. Keep credentials in a purpose-built secret store and give tools only t...

Context Engineering for AI Research: Build a Brief the Model Can Actually Use

Practical guide | October 25, 2026 Adding more material to an AI conversation can make the task harder to follow. A useful context package explains the assignment, identifies the evidence and keeps unresolved questions visible. Start with the deliverable Specify the audience, decision and output format. “Explain whether this tool is available to small businesses” is more actionable than “research this company.” Define what counts as completion, including the facts that need verification. Give evidence a consistent structure Use a short record for each source: title, URL, date, supported claims and limitations. Keep company statements attributed. Put copied source text in a clearly labeled evidence section so it does not look like an instruction from the editor. Remove distracting duplicates Ten syndications of the same announcement are not ten independent confirmations. Retain the original source and any reporting that adds material evidence. Keep conflicting accounts when the conflict...

Structured AI Outputs: Why Valid JSON Still Needs Fact Checking

Developer explainer | October 25, 2026 An AI response can match your JSON schema and still describe the wrong event. Structured output helps software consume a response predictably. It does not independently establish that the response is true. Separate shape from meaning A schema can require a title, date and source URL. That makes missing fields easier to detect. It cannot, by itself, prove that the date belongs to the event or that the linked page supports the title. Allow uncertainty explicitly When evidence is missing, a required date field can encourage an application to accept an unsuitable value. Design the data contract to permit an unknown state where appropriate. Distinguish event date from announcement date, and keep a field explaining the evidence rather than silently substituting one date for another. Add application checks Validate lengths, allowed categories and date formats in code. Then check facts against the source. For a news pipeline, verify that each citation exi...